Disturbing the Public Opinion via Helping Others

Majzooban.org - Reza Aid Institution (charity and aid social service) which is associated to Gonabadi Dervishes in the National Day of Aid with the direct involvement of security forces has been locked down and sealed off. This question may form in the minds of people what the relevance is between disturbing public opinion which is one of the crimes in law and shutting down the Reza Aid Center!? The answer is; if anyone speaks in contrast with aspirations and illegal acts of some arrogant and self-willed people, he or she will be accused and sentenced for disturbing public opinion, because he tries to break and breach the silence that the security forces have tried a lot to establish it as a norm in the society that caused the society and community bypass any injustice and cruel events indifferently.

Disturbing public opinion known as one of the charges in our country meaning that by expressing and publishing false news should not jeopardize the mental and psychological security of the society. Of course, it would be desirable if the figure to be tried in a fair court; subsequently, his conviction should be determined and defined on the basis of the conception that the respective judge obtains through the terms of "psychological security" and "public opinion security". Because the extent of the damage or false statements that this guilty person provides on the psychological security of the society; conspicuously, will have a direct correlation with the definition of the judge who interprets.
But what are the specifications and characteristics of a healthy society? If the psychological security means the silence executed by security and intelligence forces and then imposed in a society? If breaking this silence creates confusion in the minds of those who are used to this?

When the news Medias were not allowed publicize the news of embezzlements and corruption of public and governmental institutions because they were instantaneously arrested by the security forces. If they attempted to do so, people and audiences tried to bypass it with a cryptic silence because they did not wish to have the same destiny that other journalists faced with that and be kept in jails for ages. Today also the pages of newspapers and mass Medias are inundated with lots of news concerning corruption, the community is still silent as they don't believe to have any role in this complex game and have strongly faith that any of their acts would be vain and fruitless.
Now the question is, this mandatory silence according to which judicial law and also which human principle is called as "security"?

When people try to evade any bad incidents and events that embody crime, cruelty and injustice and bypass them with closed eyes and ears and self-imposed silence, soif anyone is able to confuse and perplex their minds? When even the alms and charities of donators which should be allocated to the poor and needy ones, instead, are flowed to purchase luxury and aristocratic vehicles, when assets of the country in banks instead of being consumed for burgeoning, prosperities and welfare of the society are plundered by embezzlements and used for individual interests and help the outlaws to be more arrogant, In the shadow of this all, the harbingers of security of intelligence by hiding their identity and in the clothes of civilian invades a social service institution, the social aid service that has no any intention but sending minuscule contribution and livery to those who are in need and the poor to survive. But they close this center, and seal off the premises allocated to a number of elderly and disabled people, and also by using Medias and websites as a tool try to justify people that this center is harmful and in contradictory of the community. Spontaneously, our mind is engaged that helping people to people in the absence of accountability of the governmental officials and administrations will be as a clear evidence of a crime, and if someone donates 5000 000 Rials without any profit to someone else so as to pay his or her rent of house, the donator is certainly known as a corrupt figure who cannot be punished and chastised without any involvement of security forces.

But what is the stance of the society against all these events? Nothing! Silence, silence and silence Only! And as long as this silence is run and practiced, anyone who knows himself or herself as a member of security, judiciary, and intelligence, contemplates that he is entitled to behave as he wishes in any form and shape until he can close the half-open doors and also shut down the only dim remaining hopes, and the silence that for many years has struggled to establish it as a judicial and security principle, and still announces it as "security", and makes people convinced that the protesters and objectors to this silence are known as disturbers of public opinion.