- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Tuesday 08 April 2014Iran Can't Withdraw Much Oil Revenue Under Interim Nuclear DealIran has been unable to withdraw much of the unfrozen oil revenue it was to receive under a November interim nuclear deal, a possible complication for efforts to end the decadelong standoff over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. The problems were outlined in interviews with nearly a dozen Western and Iranian officials and diplomats, bankers and lawyers with knowledge of the issue. An estimated $100 billion in payments for Iranian oil imports has been locked up in accounts in the importing countries in compliance with U.S. banking sanctions that have been among the most effective in pressuring Iran economically. Only $4.2 billion was to be freed up gradually under the interim deal. One reason Iran is having difficulty tapping the unfrozen revenue is that banks remain fearful they could violate tight U.S. financial sanctions, especially while the outcome of talks on a final nuclear deal remains uncertain. If financial institutions flout sanctions, they could be shut out of the U.S. banking system, which clears dollar transactions, or face huge fines. Some Western officials partly blame Iran for the delay. Tehran has been slow to set payment instructions specifying where the money should be sent and, in some cases, how it will use the funds—information banks may require before releasing the money. Iran's United Nations mission and foreign ministry officials declined to comment. However, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif in March publicly questioned the West's willingness "to fulfill its commitments" to implement November's accord. Western officials insist they are doing so. Iran's difficulty withdrawing the funds could undermine confidence building between Tehran and the six world powers it negotiates with. It could also stymie President Hasan Rouhani's ability to showcase domestically the benefits of the interim nuclear deal. He came to office last summer promising diplomatic outreach to ease sanctions. The negotiations between Iran and the six powers, now focused on a comprehensive, permanent agreement to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, are set to resume in Vienna on Tuesday. Iran's economy has stabilized somewhat and oil revenue has increased since the interim deal was reached in November. There are concerns in the U.S. Congress and elsewhere that sanctions relief could undermine pressure on Tehran to reach a final nuclear deal. Tehran's troubles tapping the funds suggest sanctions remain a powerful constraint and may temper those worries. Seeking to speed the release of funds, the U.S. and other Western governments have stepped in, working quietly to encourage international banks and regulators to help Iran access the revenue, diplomats said. But those efforts have only partly succeeded. The $4.2 billion in unfrozen oil revenue was the biggest single gain in a package of sanctions relief worth around $7 billion for Iran, according to U.S. officials. In exchange, Iran agreed to curtail some of the most dangerous elements of its nuclear program. Iran insists its pursuits are for purely peaceful purposes such as producing energy and medical research. The difficulty helping Iran withdraw the funds shows the practical challenges of delivering money to a country largely isolated from the global banking system because of the tight web of sanctions. On Feb. 3, the first payment of $550 million in unfrozen oil revenue was transferred from a Japanese bank to Banque de Commerce et de Placements, or BCP, in Switzerland. As of Wednesday, the funds hadn't been withdrawn. A BCP spokesman declined to comment. A spokeswoman for the Swiss Economic Affairs department, Marie Avet, confirmed the money had come to a Swiss bank. Switzerland, which hosted the talks that produced November's accord, had been asked to help facilitate the repatriation of funds, she said. A senior U.S. official confirmed that three tranches, worth $1.55 billion, have been released—meaning the U.S. has legally informed banks holding the money it is no longer subject to sanctions. The U.S. plans to unfreeze another $1 billion over five days starting Wednesday. It remains unclear where the other two tranches of already released funds are. Several diplomats said Iran hasn't yet tapped a significant part of the total. Western officials said they were making progress identifying a group of banks that can work with Iran to repatriate unfrozen funds. "We have done everything we made a commitment to do," a senior U.S. official said late Friday. "Our teams have been working very hard to facilitate everything that was required." Banks were already cautious about financing trade with Iran that was permitted before the interim deal, such as food and medicine. That remains true of commerce opened up under the November deal. Several European banks have been hit by huge fines from U.S. authorities over the last two years for allegedly engaging in improper dealings with Iran. BNP Paribas BNP.FR -1.90% said in February it had set aside $1.1 billion against potential fines for any violations of U.S. sanctions. After years of restrictions, "financial institutions are very careful when it comes to Iran and, before doing something, want to be reassured 1,000 times," said one Western diplomat. To ease concerns, the U.S. has sent letters to a number of banks "clarifying the applicability of U.S. sanctions to various circumstances," a senior official said. There have also been regular discussions between U.S., European and Iranian officials in recent weeks about the problem. One concern is that Iran could eventually use the funds for purposes the U.S. doesn't approve of. U.S. officials have warned publicly they will crack down vigorously on all those involved in violations of the remaining sanctions. Banks also face practical hurdles in helping Iran tap the money, said Farhad Alavi, a lawyer with Akrivis Law Group, a Washington-based firm. Delivering cash or precious metals could, in some cases, require firms to get hold of and then fly crate-loads of bank notes or gold to the Iranians at significant cost. Write to Laurence Norman at [email protected] and Nour Malas at [email protected] |