- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Saturday 16 November 2013McCain: Don't increase sanctions on Iran this yearYnetnews Senior senators have announced their readiness to accede to the request of the US government to not tighten sanctions on Iran at this time, as negotiations on the nuclear program continue. A surprising supporter of the Obama administration proposal is Republican Sen. John McCain, who has expressed skepticism regarding the success of the negotiations, yet announces he supports allowing the administration a chance. McCain, a close friend of Secretary of State John Kerry, who heads the diplomatic efforts with Iran, said in a BBC interview: "I am skeptical of talks with Iran but willing to give the Obama administration a couple months." Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Jewish Sen. Carl Levin, said that "whether it is a 10%, 40% or 60% chance (that the change is real), it should be tested and probed. We should not at this time impose additional sanctions." Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee Sen. Dianne Feinstein said: "I am baffled by the insistence of some senators to undermine the P5+1 talks. I will continue to support these negotiations and oppose any new sanctions as long as we are making progress toward a genuine solution." The Jewish senator wrote on her Congress website: "The purpose of sanctions was to bring Iran to the negotiating table, and they have succeeded in doing so. Tacking new sanctions onto the defense authorization bill or any other legislation would not lead to a better deal. It would lead to no deal at all." One of the major differences is Iran's right to enrich uranium. The Iranians demand that it would be part of the agreement, while the US and the other powers oppose. The world powers' proposal is to have Iran able to continue, for the duration of the negotiations, to enrich uranium to 3.5% and in return they would remove their already-enriched uranium to 20%, in order to assure that Iran does not advance towards a nuclear weapon during the talks. |