- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Friday 01 July 2011Iran keeps snooping online; U.S. struggles to intervene
U.S. officials know that Tehran is using communications equipment — some perhaps acquired from American firms — to monitor and, in some cases, interfere with Iranians’ use of the Internet and mobile phones. And yet it’s proven difficult to do anything about it. An economic sanctions bill against Iran, signed into law by President Obama last July, established a procurement ban on any entities found to have exported sensitive technology to the Islamic Republic that could be used to stifle dissent. Since then, the Iranian government has continued suppressing dissent online. But, according to the Government Accountability Office, the State Department has not identified a single individual or firm to subject to the procurement ban. Neither has the GAO, which used “credible open source information” to go looking on its own. The explanation, the GAO said in a report released this week, may have something to do with the proprietary nature of the communications industry — and its tendency to limit information about its own dealings. Or it might just be too hard to distinguish between technologies exported to Iran for reasonable purposes (“necessary and acceptable” filtering) and technologies exported to Iran for more sinister reasons. Lastly, the problem might just be that Iran is starting to produce very good snooping equipment on its own, making it less dependent on foreign firms. Whatever the reason, Iranian democracy activists continue to suffer the consequences. In its report on Internet freedom this spring, a Washington pro-democracy group concluded that, since the disputed presidential elections in 2009, Iran has used sophisticated technologies to wage a campaign against the free flow of information online. The group, Freedom House, said that the campaign has gone “well beyond simple content filtering” to include, among other things, “deliberately slowing down Internet speeds at critical times to make basic online activities difficult.” In the group’s ranking of Internet freedom in individual countries, Iran placed dead last, behind Burma, Cuba and China. North Korea, among other countries, was not surveyed. |