- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Wednesday 05 August 2009Iran: New confrontation loomsBy Paul Reynolds As Mahmoud Ahmadinejad receives the endorsement of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei for a second term as president, a new confrontation with Western countries is beginning to gather strength. The United States is leading an effort to impose sanctions on Iran's oil industry if Iran does not suspend uranium enrichment and enter talks about its nuclear programme. Ban on refined products Crucially, these new sanctions could include a ban on sending refined petroleum products and by-products to Iran. This means petrol, kerosene, diesel, propane and butane gas. Despite its oil wealth, Iran still cannot refine enough for its domestic needs. The US also wants restrictions on buying oil and gas from Iran and on investments in Iran's oil and gas industries. "Any new sanctions have to be of a different order of magnitude," was how one Western official put it recently. Timetable The timetable is for an assessment to be made of Iran's intentions in the last week of September, when world leaders always gather in New York for the annual meeting of the UN General Assembly. There would also be discussions at a G20 summit in Pittsburgh the same week. If Iran continued to resist freezing its enrichment activities and failed to agree to discuss its nuclear programme, then sanctions would be imposed, or at least realistically threatened, by the end of this year. All this follows the offer by President Obama earlier year to offer Iran an "extended hand", if Iran "unclenched its fists". This could mean direct US-Iran talks, a lifting of sanctions and the provision of aid for a civilian nuclear industry in Iran, including a guaranteed supply of enriched-uranium fuel. The president had indicated that he might wait until the end of the year for Iran's reply. The manoeuvres now under way are designed to have sanctions ready in case the final answer is a clear "no".
The US Defence Secretary Robert Gates and the National Security Adviser James Jones have already outlined the proposals to the Israeli government. The hope is that Israel will tone down its hints of military action against Iran while this new diplomatic and economic effort is given a chance. Plans A and B Plan A is for the sanctions to be imposed through the Security Council, which has already targeted Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile development. But plan B might be needed if Russia and China, both veto-holding members of the Council, do not agree, as they currently do not. Plan B is for the US to lead action by itself and its allies - there are already bills authorising such action in the Senate and the House of Representatives, and threatening retaliation on foreign companies if they do not comply.
As for China and Russia, a new diplomatic effort is to be made to persuade them that their strategic interests would be served by a peaceful resolution of this issue. Iranian attitudes Nobody expects a positive reply from Iran. President Ahmadinejad's attitude towards enrichment was seen immediately after he first took office in 2005 when he castigated Iran's then negotiating team for agreeing to a pause in enrichment and immediately ended it. He has not changed his attitude since. Iran argues that it is simply fulfilling its right to enrich fuel for nuclear power under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and that it does not intend to make a nuclear bomb. The Security Council has called on Iran to show its good faith by suspending enrichment and entering talks on the package of incentives proposed by the US and EU. And what happens if plans A and B fail to move Iran? The Israelis would probably press for a Plan C, meaning some sort of military action. |